International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Consent and Nationality In ICSID Jurisprudence: Two Old Chestnuts of ICSID Jurisdiction Revisited

12/08/2015 by International Arbitration

Consent and nationality are two concepts of deep significance in ICSID jurisprudence. Consent forms a fundamental pillar of ICSID jurisdiction, and counsel for would-be ICSID claimants regularly advise their clients to express their consent to arbitrate as early as possible. Nationality is an equally core component of ICSID jurisdiction, with the place of incorporation test […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Public International Law, Ukraine Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Damages in International Arbitration – Yukos Arbitration

27/07/2015 by International Arbitration

THE VALUATION DATE FOR DAMAGES IN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION – YUKOS ARBITRATION The valuation date for damages in international arbitration is clearly important, and it does not always coincide with date suggested by the Parties in an international arbitration. The Yukos arbitration illustrates this point. The two most significant valuation dates for damages, from a quantum […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Expropriation, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Russia’s Strategy on Quantum – Yukos Arbitration

16/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Yukos damages

RUSSIA’S STRATEGY NOT TO RESPOND SUBSTANTIVELY TO QUANTUM IN THE YUKOS ARBITRATION In order to help the Tribunal reach a proper valuation of Yukos Oil Company, Claimants put forward 13 possible scenarios.  The claims ranged from USD 30 billions to USD 114 billions (Final Award, para. 1701 – 1710) and the three main sets of […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, PCA Arbitration, Public International Law, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, United Kingdom Arbitration

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced

06/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Ukrainian flag

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced An investor-State emergency arbitrator award was enforced by a domestic court in Ukraine, as was initially reported by the Global Arbitration Review. This decision is interesting since it is the first known enforcement of an emergency arbitrator award against a State. Emergency arbitrator awards are non-binding on an arbitral tribunal, but remain in […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Emergency Arbitrator, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Ukraine Arbitration

DCF Method of Valuation – Yukos Arbitration

30/06/2015 by International Arbitration

dcf method of valuation

THE DCF METHOD OF VALUATION IN THE YUKOS ARBITRATION In most investment arbitrations, the Discounted Cash Flow method of valuation (DCF method of valuation) is becoming the norm used by Tribunals to do the valuation of ongoing profitable companies, but is it the right way? The DCF valuation method has become very popular and is […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Construction Arbitration, Expropriation, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

No Easy Exit from an Arbitral Award

© 2012-2026 · IA