International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Investor State Dispute Settlement

Lost Profits in Investment Arbitration

26/07/2020 by International Arbitration

Lost profits arbitration

It is common in investment arbitration that investors seek to recover the profits they claim to have lost as a consequence of one or more internationally wrongful acts perpetrated by a host State of foreign investment. Historically, in assessing damages there has been a distinction between damnum emergens (actual losses) and lucrum cessans (loss of […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Damages, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Energy Charter Treaty: Current Status between EU States

25/06/2020 by International Arbitration

Energy Charter Treaty

The Energy Charter Treaty (“ECT”), available here, is a multilateral agreement. It was signed in December 1994 and entered into force on 16 April 1998. It created a multilateral framework for energy long-term cooperation between its members. The Energy Charter Treaty was preceded by the European Energy Charter adopted in December 1991, under which signatories […]

Filed Under: Energy Charter Treaty, Investor State Dispute Settlement

How to File an ICSID Request for Arbitration

24/04/2020 by International Arbitration

ICSID Request for Arbitration

The filing of a Request for Arbitration before the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (the “Centre” or the “ICSID”) is a crucial and relatively straightforward step. In 2019, the ICSID Secretary-General received 39 requests for arbitration.[1] Almost all arbitration rules, including the ICSID Arbitral Rules,[2] provide that a party wishing to […]

Filed Under: Aceris Law, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Investment Arbitration

27/03/2020 by International Arbitration

Covid-19-pandemic-investment-arbitration (1)

As the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has already impacted over 150 countries worldwide, it is hard to imagine that investment arbitration will not be impacted. While the future remains uncertain, the response to the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to violate various protections provided in bilateral investment treaties (“BITs”) and may bring rise to claims […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, International Court Of Justice, Investor State Dispute Settlement

Bifurcation in Investment Arbitration

18/02/2020 by International Arbitration

Bifurcation in investment arbitration

In investment arbitration, it is rather common for arbitral tribunals to deal with preliminary issues prior to any consideration of the merits of a case. In such scenarios, the main question is whether to asses these issues together with other matters to be ruled upon in the final award or to deal with them in […]

Filed Under: ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 25
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

A FRANDly Forum? The Growing Role of Arbitration in SEP Disputes

LSG Building Solutions v. Romania: Annulment Is Not an Appeal

When an Arbitral Award Becomes State Aid

Moral Damages in Investor-State Arbitration after Emergofin

Transnational Issue Estoppel in International Arbitration: Can It Prevent Re-Litigation at the Enforcement Stage?

What the ICC’s 2025 Statistics Tell Us About the Direction of International Arbitration

Deepfakes in International Arbitration

French Court of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are at Stake

Ukraine v. Russia UNCLOS Award on Environment and Navigation

Russian Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of LCIA Awards Against RUSAL on Public Order Grounds

Blasket v. Spain: Limits on Sovereign Asset Discovery

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

© 2012-2026 · IA