International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Ukraine Arbitration

Consent and Nationality In ICSID Jurisprudence: Two Old Chestnuts of ICSID Jurisdiction Revisited

12/08/2015 by International Arbitration

Consent and nationality are two concepts of deep significance in ICSID jurisprudence. Consent forms a fundamental pillar of ICSID jurisdiction, and counsel for would-be ICSID claimants regularly advise their clients to express their consent to arbitrate as early as possible. Nationality is an equally core component of ICSID jurisdiction, with the place of incorporation test […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Public International Law, Ukraine Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced

06/07/2015 by International Arbitration

Ukrainian flag

Investor-State Emergency Arbitrator Award Enforced An investor-State emergency arbitrator award was enforced by a domestic court in Ukraine, as was initially reported by the Global Arbitration Review. This decision is interesting since it is the first known enforcement of an emergency arbitrator award against a State. Emergency arbitrator awards are non-binding on an arbitral tribunal, but remain in […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Emergency Arbitrator, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Ukraine Arbitration

Collective Arbitration Against Russia By Ukrainian Businesses Expropriated In The Crimea

12/01/2015 by International Arbitration

Collective Arbitration Against Russia By Ukrainian Businesses Expropriated In The Crimea Is collective arbitration against Russia for the expropriations of Ukrainian assets occurring in Crimea possible? An article in the New York Times dating from 11 January 2015 notes that the plunder of Ukrainian-owned assets is continuing in the Crimea on a large scale today. Armed forces known as the “people’s militia” are invading […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Argentina Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Expropriation, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, London Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, State Responsibility, Ukraine Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United Kingdom Arbitration

Yukos Owners Win Largest Arbitration Award In History Against Russia For “Devious And Calculated” Expropriation

28/07/2014 by International Arbitration

Yukos Owners Win Largest Arbitration Award In History Against Russia For “Devious And Calculated” Expropriation. Yukos’ owners have won the largest arbitration award in history against Russia for what was determined by an international arbitration tribunal to be a “devious and calculated” expropriation of its assets. Russia has been ordered to pay over USD 50.2 billion to […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Belarus Arbitration, Ecuador Arbitration, Energy Charter Treaty, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, France Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Jurisdiction, Kuwait Arbitration, New York Convention, Paris Arbitration, Russia Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration, Ukraine Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration, United States Arbitration, Zambia Arbitration

Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies Reports On Dispute Against Belarus

17/03/2014 by International Arbitration

Below, please find a recent article about our client’s investment dispute against the Republic of Belarus, which concerns his wrongful imprisonment for six years in inhuman conditions, following the expropriation of his seamless steel tube plant, located in Gomel, with no compensation. – William Kirtley A Ukrainian businessman and his Swiss company accuse Belarus of […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Belarus Arbitration, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Expropriation, France Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Lithuania Arbitration, Paris Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration, Ukraine Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

Who Bears Responsibility for AI in Arbitration? The EU AI Act and the Role of Arbitral Institutions

Foreign-Seated Corporate Arbitration Clauses in Italian Companies

© 2012-2026 · IA