Sovereign immunity is divided into immunity from jurisdiction and immunity from execution.[1] The conditions under which these immunities apply are of particular importance in the field of arbitration. According to the French Supreme Court, sovereignty and independence of States prevent one of them from pursuing another.[4] In other words, national judges must refrain from ruling […]
Legitimate Expectations in Investment Arbitration
In its judgment rendered on 1 October 2018 in the Bolivia v. Chile case, the International Court of Justice drew a distinction between public international law and investment arbitration with respect to the notion of legitimate expectations. The Court held that, contrary to bilateral investment treaties where the principle of legitimate expectations of foreign investors […]
Supplementation of an Arbitration Award under the ICSID Convention
The supplementation of an arbitration award under Article 49(2) of the ICSID Convention is a remedy for inadvertent omissions in the award due to an oversight on the part of the tribunal which is likely to be corrected by it once this oversight is pointed out. This oversight should however concern a “question” before the […]
Law of the Sea Award Rendered
In the dispute between the Republic of Malta and the Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, the Tribunal issued on 5 September 2016 an award on its jurisdiction, admissibility of claims, liability and reparation, under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The dispute relates first to the arrest of a vessel (the […]
Restitution in Investment Arbitration
In case of outright expropriation or the creeping expropriation of an investment, or of a harm caused by wrongful acts committed by a host State, restitution in investment arbitration is possible, amongst other remedies. The foreign investor can request an arbitral tribunal to order the State to fully repair the injuries it has causes. The […]