The supplementation of an arbitration award under Article 49(2) of the ICSID Convention is a remedy for inadvertent omissions in the award due to an oversight on the part of the tribunal which is likely to be corrected by it once this oversight is pointed out. This oversight should however concern a “question” before the […]
New English Court Decision Regarding Third-Party Funding Cost Recovery in Arbitration
In 2008, Norscot Rig Management Pvt Limited (“Norscot”), the Claimant, successfully brought a claim in arbitration before the ICC in London, against Essar Oilfield Services Limited (“Essar”), the Respondent. The Arbitrator (Sir Philip Otton) held that the Respondent had breached an operation management agreement relating to an offshore drilling platform and thus was liable to pay over […]
Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA)
The Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA) was established in India as a joint initiative between the Government of Maharashtra and the domestic and international business and legal communities, in order to transform Mumbai into a major international financial centre. It hopes to bring most Indian cases back from the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), […]
Law of the Sea Award Rendered
In the dispute between the Republic of Malta and the Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe, the Tribunal issued on 5 September 2016 an award on its jurisdiction, admissibility of claims, liability and reparation, under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The dispute relates first to the arrest of a vessel (the […]
Rectification of ICSID Awards
The rectification of an award under Article 49(2) of the ICSID Convention is a remedy for inadvertent omissions and minor technical errors in an award. It enables the arbitral tribunal to correct mistakes that may have occurred in the award’s drafting in a non-bureaucratic and expeditious manner. Such corrections are provided for in Article 49(2) of the ICSID Convention: […]