International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for ICC Arbitration

Investment Disputes: The Role of Third Party Funders

16/02/2016 by International Arbitration

international arbitration locations

The Role of Third Party Funders in Investment Disputes In investment disputes, when the claimant decides to pull the trigger and bring forward, one can wonder what his options are to finance the arbitral proceedings. Claimants most often do not have much capital left and are in a distressed financial situation but their claims have […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Award, Arbitration Cost, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Canada Arbitration, China Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, London Arbitration, New York Convention, Switzerland Arbitration, Third-Party Funding, United Kingdom Arbitration, Venezuela Arbitration

Investor-State Arbitration – Claimant’s Counsel’s Critical Choices

07/01/2016 by International Arbitration

investor-state arbitration

Critical Choices when Bringing an Investor-State Arbitration Claimants are faced with many difficult choices when bringing an investor-State arbitration: First, Claimant will have to decide whether to bring a case at all. While this seems straightforward and obvious, it is one of the most difficult choices for a company to make as outright expropriations today […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Damages, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Arbitrator, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Czech Republic Arbitration, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Expropriation, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, International Arbitration Law, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Italy Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Switzerland Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

A Short Analysis of the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment: Can an Investor Directly Apply to International Arbitration without Resorting to Local Courts?

19/08/2015 by International Arbitration

By Turgut Aycan Özcan & Timuçin Demir Everything concerning the Kılıç Ad-Hoc Committee’s Decision on Annulment of course started with the decision rendered in the ICSID case between a Turkish construction company, Kılıç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi (“Kılıç”), and Turkmenistan. Kılıç had filed an ICSID case (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/01) against Turkmenistan […]

Filed Under: Annulment of Arbitration Award, Arbitration Award, Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Procedure, Arbitration Rules, Bilateral Investment Treaty, Construction Arbitration, Court of Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Jurisdiction, Paris Arbitration, Turkey Arbitration, Turkmenistan Arbitration, UNCITRAL Arbitration

Swaziland ICSID Arbitration Notice Of Dispute

01/02/2015 by International Arbitration

Swaziland ICSID Arbitration Notice Of Dispute For The Expropriation Of Shareholding In Joint Venture A notice of dispute against Swaziland has been submitted to the King of Swaziland, His Majesty the King Mswati III, as well as his Prime Minister and other Government entities. Brought on behalf of the foreign investor Southern Africa Resources Limited (“SARL”), the […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Agreement, Arbitration Information, Expropriation, ICC Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, Investor State Dispute Settlement, Swaziland Arbitration

The New ICC Expert Rules Enter Into Force On 1 February 2015

26/01/2015 by International Arbitration

New ICC Expert Rules Enter Into Force On 1 February 2015 The new ICC expert rules allow parties to use the ICC to (1) propose experts, (2) appoint experts and (3) to administer expert proceedings. Three separate set of rules are included in the new ICC expert rules, rather than one as under the previous version […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Rules, Construction Arbitration, ICC Arbitration

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • 24
  • Next Page »

Search Arbitration Information

Could Iran Bring the U.S. to Arbitration Over Its Iran Strikes? A 1981 Agreement Says Yes

Third-Party Funding and Confidentiality in Investment Arbitration: Kappes v. Guatemala

Investment Arbitration in Mexico: Why an Over USD 2.1 Billion Claim Failed

New 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Arbitration in Próspera: An Arbitration Utopia?

Timing of Jurisdictional Objections in Arbitration

Law 2540/2025: A Significant Expansion of Arbitral Power

Construction Arbitration: War, Delay Claims, and Rising Project Costs

State Immunity and ICSID Awards: The UK Supreme Court Joins International Consensus on Enforcement

Singapore’s High Court Rejects Spain’s State Immunity Defence (NextEra Energy v Spain [2026] SGHC 43)

Devas v. Antrix: Dutch Enforcement and the Limits of Seat-Based Annulment

The Iran Conflict and Arbitration Disputes

Arbitration Updates: Malaysia’s 2026 Arbitration Reform

Import of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala

© 2012-2026 · IA