Daniel Rainer has written a good overview of the West Tankers decision and its impact on the choice of a seat of arbitration. It is well-worth reading and available below.
An ICC Space Arbitration: Eutelsat Communications v. SES
An International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of Paris arbitral tribunal has reached its conclusions on the first phase of the arbitration initiated by Eutelsat Communications against SES in October of 2012. Similar space arbitrations are likely to account for an increasing number of arbitrations over the coming years. Eutelsat’s request for arbitration was triggered by […]
The Enforceability of Kurdistan Petrol Sharing Agreements
The governing law of the standard Kurdistan Petrol Sharing Agreements (“PSA’s”) is English Law, and they call for any dispute arising out of the PSA to be resolved through the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) in accordance with the LCIA Rules. Yet, given that Iraq is not yet a full signatory to the Convention […]
Choosing Arbitrators
It is sometimes argued that arbitration is only as good as the arbitrator, and that defects in international arbitration may be attributed to poor arbitrators. While this oversimplifies a complex issue, choosing the right arbitrator is one of the most critical steps in any arbitration. Unless a specific arbitrator is specified in the arbitration clause, […]
How Should An Engineer’s/Dispute Adjudication Board’s Decision Be Enforced?
A crucial legal issue in relation to international construction contracts over the past decade has concerned the manner in which decisions of the Engineer made under Clause 67 of the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Works of Civil Engineering Construction, fourth edition, 1987, and, since the Engineer was replaced by the Dispute Adjudication Board (“DAB”) in the 1999 edition of the FIDIC Conditions […]