International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Belarus Arbitration

Argentina Will Withdraw from the ICSID Convention

26/01/2013 by International Arbitration

Argentina has announced that it will withdraw from the ICSID Convention, following in the footsteps of other South American nations, such as Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela. The chief legal advisor to Argentine’s Treasury is leading this project, and he called ICSID “a tribunal of butchers” that always favors multinational companies. Argentina currently faces 43 claims, […]

Filed Under: Argentina Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Bolivia Arbitration, Ecuador Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, State Responsibility, Venezuela Arbitration

The Impact of the 2012 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules on Multiparty and Multicontract Disputes

25/01/2013 by International Arbitration

The maximum number of parties involved in an ICC arbitration is at least 141, which is the number of parties to an ICC arbitration initiated by 44 member firms of Arthur Andersen’s Business Unit against 97 members firms of Andersen’s Consultant Business Unit. There, the sole arbitrator ruled that he had jurisdiction over all 141 […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Arbitrator, Austria Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Netherlands Arbitration, Paris Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration

Publication of the First Article on Security for Costs and Third-Party Funding

24/01/2013 by International Arbitration

William Kirtley and Koralie Wietrzykowski publish an article in the Journal of International Arbitration entitled “Should an Arbitral Tribunal Order Security for Costs When an Impecunious Claimant Is Relying upon Third-Party Funding?” This is the first article to examine in detail the important issue of whether security for costs should be systematically granted when a […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, Malaysia Arbitration, Montenegro Arbitration, Security for Costs in Arbitration, Third-Party Funding

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Search Arbitration Information

Rules of Ethics for Arbitrators: Which Apply?

LCIA Annual Casework Report 2025: Principal Statistics and Trends

Cyrus Capital Partners v. Mexico: Investment Managers, Control and USMCA Legacy Investments

Hong Kong Sets Aside USD 481.6 Million Award: The Duty to Address the Defence Actually Advanced

Banesco v. Panama: ICSID Jurisdiction, Foreign-Controlled Companies and Regulatory Ambiguity

Perjury and False Evidence in International Arbitration

Andraous v. Netherlands: Share Ownership, Employment Rights and the Definition of an Investment

NBA Arbitration: A Player’s Guide to Protecting Your Contract, Compensation, and Career

Legacy Vulcan, LLC v. United Mexican States: Regulatory Arbitrariness and the Limits of Investment Treaty Compensation

DIFC Court of Appeal Sets Aside DIAC Award for Procedural Unfairness in Oheo Bank v Parker [2025] DIFC CA 006

Can Arbitrators Ask Artificial Intelligence for Its View on Legal Issues?

Security for Costs in Investment Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to LCIA Arbitration

Behind the Curtain: A Step-by-Step Guide to SIAC Arbitration under the 2025 Rules

© 2012-2026 · IA