International Arbitration

International Arbitration Information by Aceris Law LLC

  • International Arbitration Resources
  • Search Engine
  • Model Request for Arbitration
  • Model Answer to Request for Arbitration
  • Find International Arbitrators
  • Blog
  • Arbitration Laws
  • Arbitration Lawyers
You are here: Home / Archives for Belarus Arbitration

Argentina Will Withdraw from the ICSID Convention

26/01/2013 by International Arbitration

Argentina has announced that it will withdraw from the ICSID Convention, following in the footsteps of other South American nations, such as Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela. The chief legal advisor to Argentine’s Treasury is leading this project, and he called ICSID “a tribunal of butchers” that always favors multinational companies. Argentina currently faces 43 claims, […]

Filed Under: Argentina Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Bolivia Arbitration, Ecuador Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, ICSID Arbitration, State Responsibility, Venezuela Arbitration

The Impact of the 2012 International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Rules on Multiparty and Multicontract Disputes

25/01/2013 by International Arbitration

The maximum number of parties involved in an ICC arbitration is at least 141, which is the number of parties to an ICC arbitration initiated by 44 member firms of Arthur Andersen’s Business Unit against 97 members firms of Andersen’s Consultant Business Unit. There, the sole arbitrator ruled that he had jurisdiction over all 141 […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Arbitration Jurisdiction, Arbitration Rules, Arbitrator, Austria Arbitration, Belarus Arbitration, France Arbitration, ICC Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Netherlands Arbitration, Paris Arbitration, Switzerland Arbitration

Publication of the First Article on Security for Costs and Third-Party Funding

24/01/2013 by International Arbitration

William Kirtley and Koralie Wietrzykowski publish an article in the Journal of International Arbitration entitled “Should an Arbitral Tribunal Order Security for Costs When an Impecunious Claimant Is Relying upon Third-Party Funding?” This is the first article to examine in detail the important issue of whether security for costs should be systematically granted when a […]

Filed Under: Arbitration Information, Belarus Arbitration, Belgium Arbitration, Iceland Arbitration, Malaysia Arbitration, Montenegro Arbitration, Security for Costs in Arbitration, Third-Party Funding

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

Search Arbitration Information

What the ICC’s 2025 Statistics Tell Us About the Direction of International Arbitration

Deepfakes in International Arbitration

French Court of Cassation Limits Enforcement Against State-Linked Assets Where EU Stability Objectives Are at Stake

Ukraine v. Russia UNCLOS Award on Environment and Navigation

Russian Court Refuses Recognition and Enforcement of LCIA Awards Against RUSAL on Public Order Grounds

Blasket v. Spain: Limits on Sovereign Asset Discovery

Can Claimants Avoid Arbitration by Adding Non-Signatory Defendants?

Singapore SICC Rejects Attempt to Set Aside Costs Award Denying Third-Party Funding Costs

FLOPEC v. Sudhaus: New York Convention Arbitration Prevails

Krimpets, Commerce, and Arbitration: The Supreme Court’s Latest FAA § 1 Decision

Rwanda v. UK: PCA Tribunal Rejects Claims Over the Asylum Partnership Agreement

Indonesia’s New Commodity Export Regime: Resource Nationalism and International Arbitration

Key Changes in the 2026 ICC Arbitration Rules

Panama Canal Ports Dispute: Key Lessons for Foreign Investors

© 2012-2026 · IA