Choosing an appropriate “seat” or “place” of arbitration is critical. There are a few common misconceptions with respect to the seat. The seat need not be the same as the governing law of the contract, or be based in the same place as the chosen arbitral institution. Thus, there is no reason why a contract […]
Chevron Wins Arbitration Victory Against Ecuador
Below, please find a solid non-legal summary of the latest state of the long-running Chevron v. Ecuador arbitral proceedings, one of the messiest and most interesting investment treaty arbitrations to have occurred over the past decade. – William Kirtley In an apparent coup for the oil giant’s efforts to undermine a $19 billion environmental judgment […]
The Enforceability of Kurdistan Petrol Sharing Agreements
The governing law of the standard Kurdistan Petrol Sharing Agreements (“PSA’s”) is English Law, and they call for any dispute arising out of the PSA to be resolved through the London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”) in accordance with the LCIA Rules. Yet, given that Iraq is not yet a full signatory to the Convention […]
6 Arbitration Institutions Win 18 of 19 Arbitration Domains in One UDRP
Six Arbitration Panels brought a single UDRP seeking 19 domain names all owned by ICSID Lawyers, LLC and collectively won 18 of the domains. The Complainants are London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) of London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“United Kingdom”); International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) of Paris, France; Singapore International Arbitration Centre […]
UK Supreme Court Again Considers Anti-Suit Injunctions
UK SUPREME COURT AGAIN CONSIDERS ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTIONS Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35 In a decision in Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 35, handed down on 12 June 2013, the Supreme Court considered whether the English courts had jurisdiction to issue […]